Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920583›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Digital Primary Health in Rwanda: Qualitative Study of User Experiences and Implementation Lessons From Babyl's Telemedicine Platform.

Sabine Musange Furere, Gashaija Absolomon, Nathalie Umutoni, Stella Matutina Umuhoza, Felix K Rubuga, Yvonne Delphine Nsaba-Uwera, Patrick Singa Muhoza, Regis Hitimana, Jeanine Condo, James Humuza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From Integrated Care to Learning Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sabine Musange FurereCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-8874
Gashaija AbsolomonCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8081-6687
Nathalie UmutoniCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6686-7625
Stella Matutina UmuhozaSchool of Public Health, University of Rwanda, KK 19 Ave, Kigali, P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda, 250 788307858.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2759-0947
Felix K RubugaCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6375-9570
Yvonne Delphine Nsaba-UweraSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-8069
Patrick Singa MuhozaIrembo, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2954-1027
Regis HitimanaSchool of Public Health, University of Rwanda, KK 19 Ave, Kigali, P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda, 250 788307858.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-931X
Jeanine CondoCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8177-6286
James HumuzaSchool of Public Health, University of Rwanda, KK 19 Ave, Kigali, P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda, 250 788307858.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7660-3663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital health innovations address health care accessibility challenges in low- and middle-income countries. Babyl, Rwanda's largest telemedicine platform, reached 450 of 510 health facilities and enrolled 2 million patients before halting in September 2023 for system redesign. Limited research has explored implementation experiences and user perspectives that influenced its sustainability. Objective: This study aims to explore user experiences and implementation lessons from Babyl's digital health platform, examining drivers that supported or hindered adoption and scale-up. This qualitative study uniquely examines the lived experiences of diverse stakeholders, active users, lapsed users, nonusers, health care providers, and Babyl agents to understand implementation challenges that contributed to the platform's halt. Methods: A qualitative, cross-sectional study used 20 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 32 key informant interviews (KIIs) across 12 health centers in ten districts with diverse utilization rates, geographic locations, and Babyl agent availability. FGDs captured collective community perspectives while KIIs provided in-depth individual experiences, enabling data triangulation. FGDs included active users, lapsed users, registered nonusers, and eligible nonregistrants. KIIs involved health center heads, health care providers, and Babyl agents. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's framework. Data saturation was achieved when no new themes emerged from the last 3 FGDs and 5 KIIs. All transcripts were validated through member checking with a subset of participants, and intercoder reliability was established with a Cohen kappa of 0.82 across 2 independent coders. Results: Five themes emerged: (1) knowledge and perceptions of digital health, (2) enablers and barriers to utilization, (3) experience and satisfaction, (4) benefits, and (5) improvement suggestions. Participants held positive perceptions of digital health for improving access and reducing wait times. Key enablers included qualified providers, convenience, privacy, and Babyl agents. Major barriers included negative perceptions of remote care quality, service delays, limited digital literacy, device access challenges, and inadequate health facility integration. Users reported high satisfaction with consultations but experienced process confusion. Patient and provider perspectives diverged: patients emphasized convenience, while providers expressed concerns about diagnostic limitations without physical examination. Digital literacy and smartphone access were pronounced barriers among rural and older participants. Recommendations included community mobilization, universal agent deployment, expanded coverage, and sustainable financing. Conclusions: Multiple implementation challenges at individual, community, health system, and policy levels contributed to Babyl's discontinuation. Critical lessons include the importance of genuine health system integration, sustainable financing, stakeholder engagement, and gradual scaling. Findings provide insights for Rwanda's health sector digitalization and other African nations investing in telemedicine platforms.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareTelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansQualitative ResearchRwandadigital healthhealth system integrationimplementation sciencelow- and middle-income countriesqualitative researchRwandatelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41920583
PMCPMC13041620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.