Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920543›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Disease After Contemporary Left-Sided Breast Radiation Therapy.

Erika Nakajima, Lena Nguyen, Ning Liu, Danielle Rodin, Eitan Amir, Peter C Austin, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Husam Abdel-Qadir

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Errors in Abstract and Table 1.JAMA network open · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erika NakajimaWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lena NguyenICES (formerly known as the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ning LiuICES (formerly known as the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle RodinPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eitan AmirICES (formerly known as the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter C AustinICES (formerly known as the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paaladinesh ThavendiranathanPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Husam Abdel-QadirWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for left-sided breast cancer historically increased the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Advances in EBRT have reduced mean heart dose, but contemporary population-level data on long-term cardiovascular outcomes remain limited. Objective: To examine whether contemporary left-sided EBRT is associated with different long-term CVD risk than right-sided EBRT among women with breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, retrospective cohort study used linked administrative health databases in Ontario, Canada, to identify women who received EBRT after a diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer between April 1, 2002, and December 31, 2017. Patients were followed up through February 28, 2025, for most outcomes and December 31, 2022, for cause-specific mortality. Data analysis was completed in August 2023 (with revisions in August 2025). Exposure: Tumor laterality (left vs right). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hospitalization with a most responsible diagnosis of CVD. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, hospitalizations for specific CVD diagnoses, coronary revascularization, and new diagnoses of ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Cumulative incidence functions estimated the 15-year risk of outcomes accounting for the competing risk of death; event rates per 100 person-years captured recurrent events. Results: Among 76 586 women (mean [SD] age, 59 [12] years; 38 427 [50.2%] with left-sided tumors) followed up for a median (IQR) of 10.9 (7.7-15.2) years, the 15-year cumulative incidence of first CVD hospitalization did not differ by laterality (left: 13.8% [95% CI, 13.4%-14.2%]; right: 13.5% [95% CI, 13.1%-13.9%]; P = .43). In women with preexisting CVD, new diagnoses of heart failure (10.2% [95% CI, 9.9%-10.6%] vs 9.6% [95% CI, 9.2%-10.0%]; P = .01) and ischemic heart disease (13.6% [95% CI, 13.2%-14.0%] vs 12.8% [95% CI, 12.4%-13.2%]; P = .03) were slightly more frequent after left-sided EBRT. The rate of CVD hospitalizations when including recurrent events was modestly higher for left-sided disease (1.72 vs 1.63 per 100 person-years; P = .006). Among women with preexisting CVD, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or recurrent CVD hospitalizations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of women treated with EBRT for breast cancer in the past 2 decades, left-sided breast cancer radiation therapy was associated with minimal increases in long-term cardiovascular risk. These findings suggest that contemporary photon-based EBRT techniques have substantially reduced the cardiovascular risk historically associated with left-sided breast cancer radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesRadiotherapyUnilateral Breast NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41920543
PMCPMC13044663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.