ArticleCJEM2026
An inventory of emergency department information systems (EDIS) in Canada: Benchmarking system functionality and technology readiness.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEmergency Department Information Systems (EDIS) are essential digital technology used in Emergency Departments (ED). Modern EDIS provide electronic patient tracking, documentation, order entry and decision support, and are crucial for enabling data analytics and Artificial-Intelligence (AI)-based tools to improve patient care. However, Canada's adoption of digital-health technology is slow, and the digital functions of current Canadian EDIS are unknown. This study presents an inventory of current Canadian EDIS functions. The primary outcome is a categorization of ED-centers as either 'mostly-digital', 'hybrid-digital & handwritten' or 'mostly-handwritten.' We hypothesized that < 50% of Canadian ED-centers are mostly-digital.
methodsA national electronic survey aiming to sample the 739 total Canadian ED-centers was conducted from Jan-Sept 2024. One response representing each center was recorded. The primary outcome was EDIS functions based on an adapted version of the electronic health record system functional model (EHR-S FM). Secondary outcomes include respondent and hospital demographics, and the ED-centers' current and future-planned EDIS use.
resultsData from 99 individuals representing 545 (74%) of the target ED-centers was obtained. The most used EDIS brands include MEDITECH (31%), EPIC Systems (21%) and Allscripts (15%). Overall, 52.4% ED-centers are mostly-digital, 47.4% are hybrid-digital & handwritten, and 0.2% are mostly handwritten. Paper-based health provider ED documentation and order entry were reported in 19.7% and 46.2% of responses. Tracking medication administration and patient vitals are paper-based in 45.6% and 21.8% of responses.
conclusionsDespite national expansion in digital-health technology, there is widespread use of paper-based processes for Canadian ED patient care. These findings affect strategic planning for use of electronic care supports and AI. Further infrastructure changes are needed in order for Canadian patients to equitably and practically benefit from AI and data analytics innovations in the ED. Large portions of the information these technologies use are in difficult to access formats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41920514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.