ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2026
Exposure-Response Relationships of Antibody Drug Conjugates in Solid Tumours.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A modular framework for antibody-drug conjugate biomarkers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last decade, there has been an increase in development of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), a drug class designed to bring chemotherapeutic agents to tumour sites. The pharmacokinetics of ADCs are complex, due to their multifaceted structure consisting of an antibody linked to a (chemotherapeutic) payload. This review provides an overview of the pharmacokinetics of approved ADCs for patients with solid tumours in relation to toxicity and/or efficacy outcomes. Due to the complex nature and in vivo modifications of an ADC, the pharmacokinetic exposure is measured partially or with surrogate entities. These entities include the calculated drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR)-corrected ADC, measured conjugated antibody, total antibody and/or free payload concentration. A clear exposure-efficacy and exposure-toxicity relation was evident for the majority of ADCs. A higher exposure of almost all ADCs approved for patients with solid tumours, specifically the conjugated antibody entity, was related to higher objective response rates. A higher exposure of the free circulating cytotoxic payload and of the surrogate entities of ADC exposure, of ADCs with cleavable linkers, was related to toxicity. This is unsurprising as a higher circulating payload may induce toxicities associated with the related chemotherapeutic compound. Non-cleavable linkers increase the plasma stability compared to cleavable linkers, resulting in the absence of an (systemic) exposure-toxicity relation. The exposure-response relations for efficacy and toxicity seem apparent based on current literature, but quantification of all ADC components should be considered to fully elucidate the exposure-response relations. This is a crucial next step for dose optimisation and development of a new generation of this important new therapeutic class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.