Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920510›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2026

Exposure-Response Relationships of Antibody Drug Conjugates in Solid Tumours.

Merel J J Lucassen, Pauline L M Buitelaar, Bart A W Jacobs, Tim Schutte, Neeltje Steeghs, Alwin D R Huitema

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A modular framework for antibody-drug conjugate biomarkers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Merel J J LucassenDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. me.lucassen@nki.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4007-9449
Pauline L M BuitelaarDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-6542-3618
Bart A W JacobsDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-5455-4431
Tim SchutteDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4096-0917
Neeltje SteeghsDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2989-2279
Alwin D R HuitemaDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1939-4639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, there has been an increase in development of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), a drug class designed to bring chemotherapeutic agents to tumour sites. The pharmacokinetics of ADCs are complex, due to their multifaceted structure consisting of an antibody linked to a (chemotherapeutic) payload. This review provides an overview of the pharmacokinetics of approved ADCs for patients with solid tumours in relation to toxicity and/or efficacy outcomes. Due to the complex nature and in vivo modifications of an ADC, the pharmacokinetic exposure is measured partially or with surrogate entities. These entities include the calculated drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR)-corrected ADC, measured conjugated antibody, total antibody and/or free payload concentration. A clear exposure-efficacy and exposure-toxicity relation was evident for the majority of ADCs. A higher exposure of almost all ADCs approved for patients with solid tumours, specifically the conjugated antibody entity, was related to higher objective response rates. A higher exposure of the free circulating cytotoxic payload and of the surrogate entities of ADC exposure, of ADCs with cleavable linkers, was related to toxicity. This is unsurprising as a higher circulating payload may induce toxicities associated with the related chemotherapeutic compound. Non-cleavable linkers increase the plasma stability compared to cleavable linkers, resulting in the absence of an (systemic) exposure-toxicity relation. The exposure-response relations for efficacy and toxicity seem apparent based on current literature, but quantification of all ADC components should be considered to fully elucidate the exposure-response relations. This is a crucial next step for dose optimisation and development of a new generation of this important new therapeutic class.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID41920510
PMCPMC13183693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.