ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Attentional lapses and mind wandering during the maintenance of visual attention over varying durations.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sustaining the focus of our attention is effortful and cannot be maintained indefinitely. Our minds naturally wander, necessitating effortful control of attention to maintain focus and resist distraction from external events or internally generated task-unrelated thoughts. However, the mechanisms underlying failures of sustained attention remain unclear, perhaps because it has proven challenging to experimentally isolate processes engaged to direct and maintain attention over short timescales from those supporting prolonged task engagement. This study investigates sustained attention and the occurrence of mind wandering in a modified version of the Sustained Attention to Cue Task, in which attention must be maintained on trials for a variable length of time to correctly detect a visual target stimulus at a spatially cued location. Latent growth curve models assessed changes in detection accuracy based on how long attention had to be maintained on trials, independent of changes occurring over the course of the entire task session. We observed that detection accuracy was dependent on the duration that attention had to be maintained on trials. In contrast, accuracy did not change as a function of time-on-task. Experience sampling mind wandering probes also caught individuals with less focus and more task-unrelated thought on trials requiring longer periods of sustained attention compared to shorter periods, particularly on later trials of the task. These findings suggest attention wanes over time, but mechanisms responsible for the maintenance of attention at short timescales may be separable from those psychological processes contributing to the degradation in task performance across longer timescales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41920493What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.