ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Modeling ventilation heterogeneity in lung fibrosis.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical forces arising from tissue heterogeneity are thought to influence the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but their impact under physiological variability remains unclear. We developed a multi-scale computational model of the human lung by embedding a micromechanical alveolar model within a gravitationally stratified lung model. Physiological variability was incorporated through a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification of material and geometric parameters derived from clinical and literature data. Simulations were performed for three scenarios: healthy lung (H), uniformly fibrotic lung (UIPF), and heterogeneously fibrotic lung with a stiff base and compliant apex (SWIPF). The model’s predictions of macroscopic lung volumes showed strong quantitative agreement with clinical data. Notably, the predicted mean total lung capacity (TLC) for the SWIPF model (3.89 L) differed from the clinical mean for IPF patients (3.95 L) by only 1.5%. Importantly, only the heterogeneous SWIPF model reproduced the characteristic non-uniform ventilation pattern observed in CT scans of IPF patients, achieving a Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) of 19.75% relative to the clinical data. This represented a significant improvement over the UIPF model, which had an NRMSE of 30.25%. These results demonstrate that structural heterogeneity is the key determinant of ventilation patterns in IPF and highlight mechanically vulnerable regions that could contribute to disease progression. A multi-scale model of IPF lung mechanics is developed and validated. Model predictions of lung volumes match clinical population statistics. Heterogeneous collagen distribution reproduces patient ventilation patterns. Hyperinflation is predicted in preserved tissue near fibrotic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.