Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920417›Full record

ArticleEndocrine pathology2026

Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors of Lung: A Case Series Supporting the IARC/WHO Common Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumor Nomenclature and Grading.

Eren Altun, Omid Savari, Mart Andrew Maravillas, Sylvia L Asa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eren AltunDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. eren.altun@sbu.edu.tr.
Omid SavariDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2589-3936
Mart Andrew MaravillasClinical Research Biostatistician, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0762-7239
Sylvia L AsaDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. pathlady01@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-5054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess whether there is sufficient evidence to recommend a change in the classification of pulmonary tumors currently classified as “carcinoid” tumors to instead apply a system similar to that used for well-differentiated gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) using the Ki67 proliferation index (PI). We retrospectively reviewed 124 cases of pulmonary NETs (“typical carcinoids” (TC) and “atypical carcinoids” (AC)) diagnosed at the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center between 2019 and 2025. Demographic, clinical, and pathology data were collected, including mitotic counts, necrosis, and Ki67 PI assessed in biopsy, resection, and metastatic specimens. Tumors were graded as G1 (≤ 3%), G2 (3–20%), and G3 (> 20%) according to the 5th edition WHO criteria for gastroenteropancreatic NETs. Grading based on Ki67 PI was significantly associated with lymphatic invasion (p = 0.007), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.016), liver metastasis (p = 0.047), AJCC stage at diagnosis (p < 0.001), and patient mortality (p = 0.047). This approach provided better correlation than necrosis for liver metastasis and mortality, better than mitoses for all negative outcomes than other than liver metastasis, and better than TC/AC classification for mortality. Tumors classified as G3 had significantly worse patient outcomes than those classified as G1 or G2. Incorporating Ki67 PI into the classification provides clinically important information regarding tumor progression, staging, and survival. These findings support the adoption of a three-tiered Ki67-based grading system (G1–G3) for pulmonary NETs, ​​similar to gastroenteropancreatic NETs.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsAdultAgedFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesTerminology as TopicWorld Health OrganizationKi-67 AntigenCarcinoidKi67LungMitosisNeuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN)Neuroendocrine tumor (NET)

Identifiers

PMID41920417
PMCPMC13043553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.