ArticleEndocrine pathology2026
Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors of Lung: A Case Series Supporting the IARC/WHO Common Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumor Nomenclature and Grading.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct Molecular Pathways Driving Thymic and Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Organ of Origin Defines Molecular Identity and Yields CD44 as a Marker of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
- Three-Tier Prognostic Stratification of Lung Carcinoids (NET G1-G2-G3) by Multivariable, Data-Driven Integration of Ki-67 and Mitotic Count.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess whether there is sufficient evidence to recommend a change in the classification of pulmonary tumors currently classified as “carcinoid” tumors to instead apply a system similar to that used for well-differentiated gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) using the Ki67 proliferation index (PI). We retrospectively reviewed 124 cases of pulmonary NETs (“typical carcinoids” (TC) and “atypical carcinoids” (AC)) diagnosed at the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center between 2019 and 2025. Demographic, clinical, and pathology data were collected, including mitotic counts, necrosis, and Ki67 PI assessed in biopsy, resection, and metastatic specimens. Tumors were graded as G1 (≤ 3%), G2 (3–20%), and G3 (> 20%) according to the 5th edition WHO criteria for gastroenteropancreatic NETs. Grading based on Ki67 PI was significantly associated with lymphatic invasion (p = 0.007), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.016), liver metastasis (p = 0.047), AJCC stage at diagnosis (p < 0.001), and patient mortality (p = 0.047). This approach provided better correlation than necrosis for liver metastasis and mortality, better than mitoses for all negative outcomes than other than liver metastasis, and better than TC/AC classification for mortality. Tumors classified as G3 had significantly worse patient outcomes than those classified as G1 or G2. Incorporating Ki67 PI into the classification provides clinically important information regarding tumor progression, staging, and survival. These findings support the adoption of a three-tiered Ki67-based grading system (G1–G3) for pulmonary NETs, similar to gastroenteropancreatic NETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.