ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026
Norwegian translation and adaptation of the INT4 version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT).
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn Norway, no standardized instrument has been available to measure outcomes of long-term care (LTC) from the perspective of the service users. The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT), developed in England, was designed for this purpose. ASCOT is a suite of tools designed that assess outcomes from the perspective of different groups receiving LTC. This article describes the translation and cultural adaptation of the four-level interview version (INT4) for use in Norwegian LTC services.
methodsThe translation followed international guidelines and included two forward translations and two back translations conducted by a professional translation company. These were followed by discussions involving the translators, the original developers, and the Norwegian in-country expert team to ensure conceptual equivalence with the original. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with LTC users. The introduction and instructions for interviewers and respondents were adapted to fit the Norwegian context.
resultsThe initial translations were overly literal. Based on extensive team discussions and findings from cognitive interviews, the text was revised to achieve fluent, simple, everyday Norwegian language in the instructions, questions and response options. Any superfluous text was removed.
conclusionThe Norwegian version of the ASCOT INT4 is a carefully translated and culturally adapted instrument that closely reflects the constructs of the original English version.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.