Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920329›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026

Cosmesis and Body Image After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.

Sarah Ashmore, Kimberly Kenton, Alesha Kotian, Keilah Dos Santos, Anna Hornbach, Kelsey Nichols, Margaret G Mueller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah AshmoreSection of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. sleilaniashmore@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7826-3765
Kimberly KentonSection of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alesha KotianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Keilah Dos SantosMichigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Anna HornbachSection of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kelsey NicholsSection of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Margaret G MuellerSection of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisSatisfaction of surgical scars after robotic sacrocolpopexy have not yet been explored.

objectiveTo determine differences in patient perception of body image and cosmesis following single port (SP) versus traditional multiport (TMP) robotic sacrocolpopexy.

methodsWe performed a prospective cohort study at a single tertiary care center of women undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy between September 2023 and December 2024. Women undergoing SP or TMP robotic sacrocolpopexy for prolapse were included. At 3 months after surgery, participants completed the Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ). The BIQ is a 10-item survey which includes a body image, cosmetic, and self-confidence scale used to assess a patient's perception of body image and cosmesis after surgery. Low scores on the body image scale and high scores on the cosmetic indicated higher patient satisfaction. Changes in preoperative and postoperative self-confidence scores were calculated. A positive change in scores was associated with higher self-confidence after surgery.

resultsOne hundred fourteen participants underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy: 63 (45%) SP and 77 (55%) TMP robot. Median (range) body image scale and cosmetic scale scores for the entire cohort were 5 (5-16) and 20 (5-24), respectively. Median preoperative and postoperative self-confidence scores were 8 (0-10) and 8 (2-10), respectively. There were no significant differences in total body image scale (p = 0.55) and cosmetic scale (p = 0.17) scores between groups. Change in self-confidence score after surgery was also similar (p = 0.14).

conclusionsWomen were highly satisfied with their body image and cosmesis of surgical scars after robotic sacrocolpopexy without significant differences between SP and TMP approaches.

Indexed as

Body ImageCicatrixGynecologic Surgical ProceduresPatient SatisfactionPelvic Organ ProlapseRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedBody SatisfactionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesBody imageCosmesisPatient satisfactionRobotic sacrocolpopexySingle port sacrocolpopexySurgical scars

Identifiers

PMID41920329
PMCPMC13486112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.