SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2026
Promoting the Self-Management of Women with IC/BPS: Insights into International Guidelines (Systematic Review).
Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisInterstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a chronic condition characterized by bladder pain and lower urinary tract symptoms, predominantly affecting women and significantly impairing quality of life. Particularly in the absence of reliable knowledge about etiology and appropriate treatment of IC/BPS, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) emphasize self-management as a key element of care. This review was aimed at comparing recommendations from CPGs, focusing on interventions to facilitate the self-management of women with IC/BPS.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following a preregistered protocol. Databases and libraries MEDLINE, Guidelines International Network, Cochrane Library, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network were searched. Data extraction focused on interventions facilitating self-management, following the definition according to Corbin and Strauss. Recommendations were categorized and presented with grade of recommendation and level of evidence. CPG quality was appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument.
resultsEight CPGs from Europe, North America, and Asia were included. All emphasized self-management as essential for IC/BPS care and contained recommendations across ten core categories, including dietary modification, bladder training, multimodal pain management, stress management, sexual health, and others. Although certain interventions such as physiotherapy referral and bladder diaries were frequently recommended, overall consistency and strength of evidence were limited. DISCUSSION: Although some consensus exists, recommendations vary in focus and often lack strong evidence. Gender-specific aspects are rarely addressed. These findings highlight the need for more consistent, evidence-informed, and patient-centered CPGs that explicitly account for the gendered and biographical dimensions of living with IC/BPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.