ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2026
Identification of the distal end of the palisade vessels under sedation: a multicenter prospective study in Japan.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the distal end of palisade vessels (DEPV) has recently been proposed as an anatomically appropriate endoscopic landmark for defining the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), its evidence under sedation remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate DEPV visualization under sedation, including its detectability and related factors.
methodsThis was a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted at 15 institutions across Japan. Patients underwent real-time endoscopic GEJ observation under sedation in three views: forward view on insertion, retroflex view, and forward view on withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the DEPV identification rate. The secondary endpoints included the DEPV identification rates across three sedation levels and factors associated with unsuccessful DEPV identification.
resultsA total of 638 patients were enrolled. The DEPV identification rate was highest in the forward view on insertion (77.0%). When the retroflex view and/or the forward view on withdrawal were additionally considered, the overall identification rate increased to 85.3%. The identification rate declined with deeper sedation, while combining all three views yielded identification rates ranging from 80.1% under deep sedation to 100% under minimal sedation. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for unsuccessful DEPV identification were deep sedation (odds ratio [OR], 3.83), reflux esophagitis (OR, 2.24-16.37), and incomplete GEJ distention (OR, 8.87), whereas hiatus hernia was protective (OR, 0.52).
conclusionsThis largest multicenter prospective study demonstrated that early DEPV identification during insertion is most effective, whereas deep sedation adversely affects visualization, supporting a standardized approach for routine GEJ assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.