ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Microplastic uptake and impacts on crops under realistic exposure: implications for soil-plant systems.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Growth, Root, Photosynthetic, and Soil Responses of Poplar Seedlings to an Equal-Mass PVC-PE-PS Microplastic Mixture.Biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Size-, Shape-, and Number Concentration-Dependent Nanoplastics Accumulation and Growth Responses in Lettuce.Polymers · 2026Article
- Fate, transport, and biological impacts of microplastics in agricultural soil-wheat systems: from soil movement to food safety.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing micro- and nanoplastic (MNP) contamination of agroecosystems has become a significant concern due to their potential effects on crops and food safety, yet their fate and effects under environmentally realistic conditions remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate the behaviour, toxicity and uptake of MNPs under realistic exposure conditions, considering polymer types, size, concentration and surface characteristics, in two crop plants: wheat (Triticum aestivum) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in a silty loam soil, under both individual and mixed exposure. Plant presence significantly reduced the leaching of aged polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibres and polyethylene (PE) fragments in soils, with smaller MPs (average 124 µm) leaching more than larger MPs (average 568 µm), implying a plant-mediated retention effect. Fibres caused greater effects than fragments, particularly in tomato, reducing chlorophyll content and plant growth. Notably, mixed MNP exposures induced more pronounced phytotoxicity in tomato than single exposures, suggesting potential synergistic effects. Although pristine NPs (∼400 nm) were not taken up, we found that aged NPs can be absorbed by plant and translocated to both roots and stem base tissue in both species, with further translocation to the leaf vascular system observed in tomato, highlighting the impact of surface characteristics on the uptake. This study provides new evidence on the effects and uptake of environmentally representative MNPs, addressing a critical gap in current research that mostly relies on pristine MNPs and at unrealistic concentrations. Our findings highlight the urgent need for risk assessments and regulatory frameworks that reflect real-world conditions to protect sustainable agriculture and public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.