Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920239›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Healthcare Experiences of Muslim Women in the USA: A Scoping Review.

Kubra Tor-Cabuk, Ivy K Ho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kubra Tor-CabukDepartment of Psychological Science, Central Connecticut State University, 1615 Stanley Street, New Britain, CT, 06053, USA.
Ivy K HoDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 850 Broadway Street, Lowell, MA, 01854-3059, USA. Ivy_Ho@uml.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7844-9495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review summarized the literature related to the healthcare experiences of Muslim women in the USA. Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) scoping review methodology guided the data selection and screening. Ferrari's (2015) narrative review methodology was used to identify key concepts from the included studies. Four key concepts were identified: modesty, perceived discrimination, patient-provider relationship, and influence of Islam. Future research is needed to understand the barriers and facilitators of healthcare utilization and provide findings related to the relationship between Muslim patients and providers.

Indexed as

DiscriminationHealthcareMuslim womenWomen’s health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.