Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920238›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026

Caregiver-perceived behavioral challenges in fragile X syndrome and implications for measuring treatment benefit in clinical trials.

Elizabeth Merikle, Nancy Tich, Terri Sebree, Randi Hagerman, Stephen O'Quinn, George Nomikos, Kristen Bzdek

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03614663 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multiple-Center, Efficacy and Safety Study of ZYN002 Administered as a Transdermal Gel to Children and Adolescents With Fragile X Syndrome), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03614663 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multiple-Center, Efficacy and Safety Study of ZYN002 Administered as a Transdermal Gel to Children and Adolescents With Fragile X Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorZynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled212ConditionsFragile X SyndromeArmsZYN002 - Cannabidiol Transdermal Gel, Placebo Transdermal Gel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth MerikleHarmony Biosciences, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA. emerikle@harmonybiosciences.com.
Nancy TichHarmony Biosciences, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA.
Terri Sebree1323 Consulting, LLC, Johnson City, TX, USA.
Randi HagermanMedical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (MIND) Institute, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Stephen O'QuinnPerissos Inc, Wake Forest, NC, USA.
George NomikosHarmony Biosciences, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA.
Kristen BzdekHarmony Biosciences, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA.

Funding

Harmony Biosciences Harmony Biosciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFragile X Syndrome (FXS) is a rare X-linked genetic condition. Children with FXS exhibit a variety of challenging behaviors such as irritability, anxiety, and preference for solitary activities. The Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C) is an observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) measure that captures many of the behavioral concerns (e.g., outbursts, social anxiety, difficulty connecting with others) salient to caregivers of individuals with FXS. An FXS-specific scoring algorithm of the ABC-C, considered more representative of the FXS phenotype (ABC-CFXS), has been included in numerous clinical studies of treatments for FXS. The goal of this qualitative research was to establish the content validity of the ABC-CFXS domain structure in parents/caregivers of children with FXS and determine whether it is fit-for-purpose for measuring treatment benefit in clinical studies of FXS.

methodsThe qualitative data came from 3 sources: (1) Concept elicitation (CE) interviews with caregivers of children with FXS (N = 10); (2) Caregiver survey (CS) (N = 212) completed at entry to CONNECT-FX (NCT03614663); and (3) Cognitive interviews of the ABC-CFXS with caregivers of children with FXS (N = 25). Qualitative coding and analysis were consistent with best practices and followed principles in applied thematic (content) analysis. Item comprehension and relevancy of the ABC-CFXS were also examined based on data from cognitive interviews.

resultsThe mean age of individuals with FXS was 10 (range 3–17) years and was consistent across the 3 data sources. The most frequently reported behavioral challenges described by caregivers were generally consistent across the CE interviews and the CS. Socially avoidant behaviors were most prevalent (70% and 49%, respectively) followed by socially unresponsive/lack of interaction (60% and 51%, respectively) and aggression (60% and 43%, respectively). Saturation of behavioral challenges related to FXS was reached in both the CE interviews and CS and was consistent with the content of the ABC-CFXS. Cognitive interviews showed that caregivers could understand and interpret the content and response options of the ABC-CFXS and deemed its content relevant to their experience.

conclusionsThe content validity evidence from this qualitative research supports the use of ABC-CFXS as an efficacy measure in FXS clinical research studies. CLINICAL

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

CaregiversFragile X SyndromeParentsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAberrant behavior checklistCognitive interviewsConcept elicitation interviewsContent validityFragile X syndromeFXSQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41920238
PMCPMC13168368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.