ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Spinal robotics vs. cone-beam navigation : A multidimensional comparison of both procedures].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCone-beam-based navigation as well as robot-assistance are being increasingly employed in spine surgeries to avoid implant misplacement.
objectivesComparison of technique, precision, radiation dosage, resource needs, and spectrum of application of both methods. MATERIALS UND
methodsBesides In addition to a literature search, learning curves of surgical time and radiation dosages were compared between the first 50 robotic cases and 100 cases each with cone-beam navigation or fluoroscopic assistance.
resultsWhile robot assistance comes with highest precision and speed, cone-beam-navigation holds the largest spectrum of application. When implementing the robot, the current learning curve is flatter and longer.
conclusionsBoth technical assistance systems provide a reduced complication rate via increased precision and safety. Acceptance of the high acquisition costs can lead to a reduction in radiation dosage and surgical procedure times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41920229What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.