ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Sampson's artery: anatomical, surgical and radiologic implications.
Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSampson’s artery (SA), the artery of the round ligament, is a small vessel coursing alongside the round ligament of the uterus. The SA has significant clinical implications, particularly in obstetrics, gynecology, radiology, and general surgery. This study aims to synthesize current anatomical, embryological, and clinical evidence regarding SA and clarify its relevance for surgeons, radiologists, and anatomists.
methodsA structured search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed using the terms “Sampson’s artery,” “artery of the round ligament,” and “round ligament artery.” Publications describing anatomical, radiological, embryological, or surgical findings were included without year restriction. Case reports, imaging studies, and reviews were analyzed for anatomic origin, course, variations, and clinical outcomes. A total of 88 articles were retrieved, and 33 met the inclusion criteria.
resultsSampson’s artery most often arises from the inferior epigastric artery or external iliac artery. It anastomoses with a branch of the uterine artery and contributes to the utero-ovarian anastomosis. Its caliber may increase during pregnancy or pelvic pathology, producing collateral flow that can contribute to postpartum hemorrhage, placenta accreta, leiomyoma rupture, or postoperative hemoperitoneum after hernia repair. Radiologically, persistent bleeding after uterine artery embolization frequently involves this vessel. Awareness remains limited among surgeons and trainees.
conclusionAlthough small, SA has disproportionate surgical and radiologic importance. Awareness of the SA as a possible source of persistent hemorrhage is essential for improving outcomes in pelvic and gynecologic procedures. Comprehensive preoperative planning and refinement of surgical and radiologic approaches can further minimize SA-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41920218What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.