Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920025›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2026

Assessing antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal efficacy of non-porous materials using small droplet transfer: the simulated splash method.

Alexander J Cunliffe, Emma Chareyre, Peter Askew, Gillian Iredale, Abby Marchant, James Redfern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander J CunliffeDepartment of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7099-0121
Emma ChareyreDepartment of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-0958-0182
Peter AskewIndustrial Microbiological Services Ltd., Hartley Whitney, Hants, United Kingdom.
Gillian IredaleIndustrial Microbiological Services Ltd., Hartley Whitney, Hants, United Kingdom.
Abby MarchantIndustrial Microbiological Services Ltd., Hartley Whitney, Hants, United Kingdom.
James RedfernDepartment of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0958-683X

Funding

European Commission 101058554UK Research and Innovation 10042534UK Research and Innovation 10055606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transfer of microorganisms via contaminated small droplets presents a vital pathway to the spread of disease. These droplets can be expelled actively by coughing and sneezing, but also via a proxy, such as splashes from contaminated sinks and toilets. Antimicrobial materials provide a preventative approach to controlling the microbial populations on surfaces to combat this issue. However, currently, there are limited standardized testing methods for assessing the antimicrobial efficacy of surfaces using small droplets in a realistic manner. Furthermore, the impact of moisture is often overlooked in current standards. Thus, a method of assessing antimicrobial materials in realistic conditions using contaminated small droplets was developed to assess the efficacy of a given material under both wetted and dry conditions. Additionally, this method was translated to determine the impact of moisture on the antimicrobial efficacy of copper surfaces against bacteria (methicillin-resistant

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntiviral AgentsCopperBacteriophage phi 6Candida albicansLevivirusMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaStainless SteelAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntiviral AgentsCopperStainless Steelantimicrobial materialsbuilt environmentcopperrelative humiditysmall droplet

Identifiers

PMID41920025
PMCPMC13101517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.