Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919910›Full record

ArticleBrazilian oral research2026

Brightness and contrast adjustments influence proximal caries detection on handheld X-ray radiographs.

Débora Costa Ruiz, Marcyele Natane da Silva Morais, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo, Matheus Lima Oliveira, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Francisco Haiter-Neto

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Débora Costa RuizUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2223-1286
Marcyele Natane da Silva MoraisUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5278-540X
Hugo Gaêta-AraujoUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, Department of Stomatology, Public Health, and Forensic Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5087-5022
Matheus Lima OliveiraUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8054-8759
Deborah Queiroz FreitasUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1425-5966
Francisco Haiter-NetoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-8307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions in radiographs acquired with a handheld X-ray device. A complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor (SnapShot, Instrumentarium Imaging, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and a handheld Eagle X-ray device (Alliage, São Paulo, Brazil) were used to acquire radiographs of 20 mandibular molars and 20 mandibular premolars randomly arranged in 20 phantoms. The device settings were 60 kVp, 2.5 mA, and 0.45 seconds of exposure. Brightness and contrast of the resulting radiographs were modified in four combinations: a) -30% brightness and +30% contrast; b) -15% brightness and +15% contrast; c) +15% brightness and -15% contrast; and d) +30% brightness and -30% contrast. After randomization, the original radiographs and the four modified versions were individually assessed by five oral and maxillofacial radiologists to detect proximal caries lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated from the examiners' responses and compared with one-way analysis of variance (p<0.05). Intra- and inter-examiner agreement for radiographic diagnosis was assessed using the weighted kappa index. Sensitivity values for detecting proximal caries lesions on radiographs with increased brightness and decreased contrast (+ 30% brightness and -30% contrast) were significantly lower compared with the other combinations (p < 0.05), whereas AUC and specificity values were not influenced by the adjustments tested (p > 0.05). Therefore, increasing brightness and decreasing contrast on radiographs acquired with a handheld X-ray device is not recommended, since it may impair diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries lesions.

Indexed as

Dental CariesPortable X-RayRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiography, DentalRadiography, Dental, DigitalAnalysis of VarianceArea Under CurveBicuspidHumansMolarObserver VariationPhantoms, ImagingReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID41919910
PMCPMC13038072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.