ArticleBrazilian oral research2026
Brightness and contrast adjustments influence proximal caries detection on handheld X-ray radiographs.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions in radiographs acquired with a handheld X-ray device. A complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor (SnapShot, Instrumentarium Imaging, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and a handheld Eagle X-ray device (Alliage, São Paulo, Brazil) were used to acquire radiographs of 20 mandibular molars and 20 mandibular premolars randomly arranged in 20 phantoms. The device settings were 60 kVp, 2.5 mA, and 0.45 seconds of exposure. Brightness and contrast of the resulting radiographs were modified in four combinations: a) -30% brightness and +30% contrast; b) -15% brightness and +15% contrast; c) +15% brightness and -15% contrast; and d) +30% brightness and -30% contrast. After randomization, the original radiographs and the four modified versions were individually assessed by five oral and maxillofacial radiologists to detect proximal caries lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated from the examiners' responses and compared with one-way analysis of variance (p<0.05). Intra- and inter-examiner agreement for radiographic diagnosis was assessed using the weighted kappa index. Sensitivity values for detecting proximal caries lesions on radiographs with increased brightness and decreased contrast (+ 30% brightness and -30% contrast) were significantly lower compared with the other combinations (p < 0.05), whereas AUC and specificity values were not influenced by the adjustments tested (p > 0.05). Therefore, increasing brightness and decreasing contrast on radiographs acquired with a handheld X-ray device is not recommended, since it may impair diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.