ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2026
Inequalities in the health care system utilization for intrauterine device insertion.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto investigate the utilization of the Health Care System by women of reproductive age for intrauterine device insertion and to analyze possible inequalities according to sociodemographic characteristics.
methodcross-sectional study, nested in a prospective cohort, with a random sample of 515 women ≥18 years old, conducted by obstetric nurses at a referral service for intrauterine device insertion. A structured face-to-face questionnaire was applied to obtain information on the use of the healthcare system for intrauterine device insertion. The analysis was based on the Behavioral Model of Health Service Use. Logistic regression and multinomial regression were used to estimate the Odds Ratio of the health care system use according to predisposing factors, race/color, and parity, and facilitating factor, education.
resultsmost women are aware of and utilize the system's health services, especially those with lower levels of education and multiparous women. However, the use of these services to access the intrauterine device is lower, with low access to guidance on reproductive planning and the insertion of the intrauterine device in the services, even lower among those with less education and nulliparous women.
conclusionthe lower chance of using the health care system to access the intrauterine device among women with less education and nulliparous women reveals social inequalities in access to contraception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.