ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2026
A population-based legacy study of myasthenia gravis in Iceland: insights from a small Arctic nation.
Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune neuromuscular disorder for which population-based estimates remain scarce, particularly in small, homogeneous settings. Leveraging Iceland's centralized healthcare, we reassessed MG epidemiology and clinical features in a nationwide legacy cohort. Cases diagnosed from 1981 to 2002 were identified through hospital databases, private neurologists, immunology laboratory records and the national MG association. Inclusion required characteristic symptoms plus at least one confirmatory test (response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, abnormal electrophysiology, or positive antibodies). Point prevalence was calculated on 31 December 2002, and incidence for 1997-2002. In 2003, patients were evaluated to document diagnostic delay, treatment patterns and disease severity; descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were applied. Twenty-six patients met criteria, yielding a prevalence of 9.0 per 100,000 and a mean annual incidence of 0.78 per 100,000. The female-to-male ratio was 1.2:1; mean age at onset was 43 years overall (29 in women, 59 in men). Ocular symptoms predominated at presentation. Nineteen percent experienced diagnostic delays exceeding three years. By 2003, 54% had generalized MG and 27% were in complete remission off medication. This historical cohort aligns with global trends of rising prevalence and illustrates the value of legacy datasets for rare disease surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.