ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026
Organ-specific terpenoid responses in Tanacetum vulgare are chemotype-dependent.
Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Specialized metabolites such as terpenoids are known to mediate plant defence mechanisms. However, how terpenoid diversity governs inducible chemistry across organs remains poorly understood. We used three shoot terpenoid chemotypes of common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) to test whether (i) root-chewing wireworms induce root terpenoids locally and alter shoot terpenoids systemically and (ii) phloem-feeding aphids induce a chemical response depending on chemotype, (iii) chemotypes differ in root-system development. Plants were grown in rhizotrons and monitored for 60 days. After root establishment, they were challenged with root-chewing wireworms (Agriotes spp.) and/or phloem-feeding aphids (Macrosiphoniella tanacetaria). Wireworms increased stored root sesquiterpenoid levels by more than twofold in chemotypes 1 and 2, whereas chemotype 3 was largely unresponsive. Aphids did not alter root terpenoids, but significantly increased shoot monoterpenoid emissions in chemotype 1 without affecting stored pools. Therefore, storage and emission were decoupled, and induction depended on both organ (roots versus shoots) and chemotype. Chemotype 1 also exhibited larger root systems than the others, consistent with its stronger inducibility. Our analysis reveals a compartmentalized, chemotype-specific defence strategy in tansy. This organ-specific separation of induction pathways suggests coordinated genetic control of terpenoid biosynthesis and release, and provides a phytochemical framework for understanding above- versus belowground herbivore interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.