ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Understanding Fabrication Variability in Core-Shell Soft Biomaterials Using Stochastic Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A blood-brain barrier model based on flexible tubes to tailor the biophysical and chemical environment for drug delivery testing.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Approaches for the fabrication of biomaterials are currently numerous, with a wide diversity of available material precursors, chemistries, and processing technologies. Owing to the complex nature of the human body, biomaterials are targeted for applications with highly diverse performance demands. Traditional strategies based on trial and error have fallen short of predicting the ideal parameters required to produce adequate structures to meet these challenges. Although the design of experiments enables reducing experimental testing, it has failed to predict complex, multi-factorial processing effects, including experimental variability. Despite being often overlooked, experimental variability is an important aspect in biomaterials, which are often processed from source materials with significant compositional variability (e.g., natural polymers), along with processing methodologies frequently undertaken under poorly controlled environmental conditions. Here, a machine learning approach based on Gaussian processes (GPs) is developed to identify patterns and correlations between fabrication conditions and material properties. Flexible soft membrane-based tubular materials obtained by polyelectrolyte complexation are used as a model biomaterial characterized by multi-parametric design inputs. Using GPs, the effects of processing parameters on the magnitude and variability of key properties like permeability, porosity, thickness, opacity, and swelling ratio are quantified. This approach is expected to enable more reliable and predictable biomaterial fabrication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.