Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919353›Full record

ReviewHistology and histopathology2026

Telocytes in skeletal muscle: Emerging players in homeostasis and repair/regeneration.

Irene Rosa, Eloisa Romano, Mirko Manetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Histology and histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irene Rosa *Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Eloisa Romano *Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Mirko ManettiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. mirko.manetti@unifi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telocytes (TCs) have recently emerged as novel components of the skeletal muscle interstitium. They are distinguished from other stromal cells by their immunophenotypic profiles and, especially, unique ultrastructural traits. Specifically, TCs feature a small cell body and very long, thin telopodes with a moniliform appearance conferred by the alternation of slender segments (podomers) and small dilated portions (podoms). Experimental evidence suggests that, as part of the skeletal muscle stem cell niche, TCs may be involved in orchestrating satellite cell activation and myogenic differentiation through both direct physical interactions and paracrine signaling. Yet, further in-depth research is needed to uncover specific immunophenotypic signatures for skeletal muscle TCs within the niche, as well as to identify the signaling pathways by which they influence neighboring satellite cells and, possibly, other cellular components of the niche. In the present review, particular emphasis is placed on the putative strategic role of TCs in maintaining skeletal muscle tissue homeostasis, their involvement in muscle pathological alterations, and, most importantly, their possible role in the coordination of the regenerative response following injury. In perspective, the promising therapeutic potential of TC-based strategies to enhance skeletal muscle tissue repair/regeneration and restrain post-injury fibrosis is also discussed.

Indexed as

HomeostasisMuscle, SkeletalRegenerationTelocytesAnimalsHumansMuscle DevelopmentSatellite Cells, Skeletal Muscle

Identifiers

PMID41919353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.