Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919307›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2026

From combustion to consequence: respiratory health concerns from primary and aged smoke at the wildland-urban interface.

Veronica L Penuelas, David D Lo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Veronica L PenuelasDivision of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
David D LoDivision of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As climate conditions worsen, wildfires are occurring more often, scorching millions of acres of land and carrying both flames and smoke into urban environments. The resulting smoke emissions from fires in the wildlands, as well from fires crossing into urban spaces, are highly toxic with a chemical composition and concentration changing from fire to fire, depending on material burnt and oxygen availability. Furthermore, as smoke ages and travels, it undergoes a process of oxidation where it converts from primary to secondary organic aerosols. Unfortunately, due to the complex nature of wildfire smoke, studying the health effects from smoke exposure has proven difficult. Currently, literature highlights the developments of various cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and mental health conditions from chronic or acute exposure, but the disrupted biological pathways, biomarker expression, and resulting pathophysiology of smoke toxin exposure related disease development remain unknown. In this review, we discuss commonly reported adverse health outcomes from wildland and wildland urban interface smoke exposures with a primary focus on respiratory conditions. Furthermore, we address the changing composition of primary versus secondary, or aged, smoke and how it relates to the wildfire public health concern. Lastly, we aim to delineate the actions needed to correlate chronic disease development to smoke toxin exposure and highlight the need for a reliable experimental system to study these unanswered questions.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsEnvironmental ExposureRespiratory Tract DiseasesSmokeWildfiresHumansAir PollutantsSmokeaged smokePAHsprimary organic aerosolsrespiratory healthsecondary organic aerosolssmoke exposurewildland fireswildland-urban interface

Identifiers

PMID41919307
PMCPMC13033653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.