ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The application of focused assessment with sonography for trauma in resource-limited settings: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trauma represents a leading cause of mortality and disability in resource-limited settings. However, access to advanced imaging modalities is severely constrained, limiting timely and accurate diagnosis as well as clinical decision-making. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) offers a portable, non-ionizing, and cost-effective bedside imaging solution with significant potential for clinical application. It enables rapid identification of life-threatening hemoperitoneum or hemothorax, thereby guiding immediate surgical intervention or preventing unnecessary patient transfers. As such, FAST contributes to improved triage, reduced decision-making time, and enhanced efficiency in trauma care delivery within these contexts. Nevertheless, there remains a lack of comprehensive synthesis regarding its implementation models, effectiveness, and associated challenges in low-resource environments. Methods: Adhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across six databases-PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and SinoMed-up to October 11, 2025. Study screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed independently, resulting in the inclusion of 29 eligible studies. Results: The synthesis of 29 included studies demonstrates that FAST is a highly effective tool in resource-limited settings. It exhibits high specificity (94%-100%) in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid, supporting reliable clinical decision-making. FAST has been successfully integrated into diverse healthcare contexts, including pre-hospital emergency response and primary care clinics. A critical enabler of its implementation is task-shifting, with nurses, general practitioners, and other non-specialist healthcare providers serving as primary operators. Nonetheless, persistent challenges include limited equipment availability and difficulties in maintaining operator competency, underscoring the need for innovative solutions such as remote tele-guidance, cascade training programs, and the development of local training capacity. Conclusion: As a rapid, portable, and cost-efficient diagnostic modality, FAST plays a vital role in strengthening trauma care systems in resource-limited settings. Despite existing limitations, its sustainable scale-up depends on the integration of technological access, robust training frameworks, and supportive health policies. Such a multifaceted approach is essential to improving survival rates and long-term outcomes for trauma patients in these regions and advancing global trauma care equity. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2T7BK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.