Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919271›Full record

ArticleDeep generative models : 5th MICCAI workshop, DGM4MICCAI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025, Proceedings. DGM4MICCAI (Workshop) (5th : 2025 : Taejon-si, Korea)2026

Neural Autoregressive Modeling of Brain Aging.

Ridvan Yesiloglu, Wei Peng, Md Tauhidul Islam, Ehsan Adeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deep generative models : 5th MICCAI workshop, DGM4MICCAI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025, Proceedings. DGM4MICCAI (Workshop) (5th : 2025 : Taejon-si, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ridvan YesilogluDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Wei PengDept. of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Md Tauhidul IslamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ehsan AdeliDept. of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of gait disturbances as individualized digital biomarker trajectories in preclinical dementiaR01AG089169 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Adeli · 2024 to 2026
$4.5M
High-performance deep neural networks for medical image analysisR00LM014309 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Md Tauhidul Islam · 2025 to 2026
$492k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG089169NLM NIH HHS R00 LM014309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain aging synthesis is a critical task with broad applications in clinical and computational neuroscience. The ability to predict the future structural evolution of a subject's brain from an earlier MRI scan provides valuable insights into aging trajectories. Yet, the high-dimensionality of data, subtle changes of structure across ages, and subject-specific patterns constitute challenges in the synthesis of the aging brain. To overcome these challenges, we propose NeuroAR, a novel brain aging simulation model based on generative autoregressive transformers. NeuroAR synthesizes the aging brain by autoregressively estimating the discrete token maps of a future scan from a convenient space of concatenated token embeddings of a previous and future scan. To guide the generation, it concatenates into each scale the subject's previous scan, and uses its acquisition age and the target age at each block via cross-attention. We evaluate our approach on both the elderly population and adolescent subjects, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art generative models, including latent diffusion models (LDM) and generative adversarial networks, in terms of image fidelity. Furthermore, we employ a pre-trained age predictor to further validate the consistency and realism of the synthesized images with respect to expected aging patterns. NeuroAR significantly outperforms key models, including LDM, demonstrating its ability to model subject-specific brain aging trajectories with high fidelity.

Indexed as

agingautoregressivebrainmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)transformer

Identifiers

PMID41919271
PMCPMC13035358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.