SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Association of hormone therapy with spheno-orbital meningiomas: bridging evidence and unknowns.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between hormone therapy and the development, progression, and treatment response of spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs) and to identify current evidence gaps in clinical management. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using an advanced search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for articles published in English. The selection process adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria targeted original research published from inception to May 2025, which discussed hormone therapy exposure and SOMs. Study quality was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools appropriate to each study design. Results: Twenty articles were retrieved. After screening, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The studies comprised 2 case reports, 1 prospective cohort, and 7 retrospective cohorts, totaling 315 patients with SOMs. The gender distribution was predominantly female (166 women, 4 men) in the 7 studies that reported mean age data for patients with SOM. The patients had a mean (SD) history of 12.6 (3.67) years of hormone therapy exposure, with 90% of the therapies being progestins. Six studies reported a decrease in the SOM volume after hormone therapy cessation, and 4 studies documented a decrease in the soft tissue component with progression or stabilization of the intraosseous component. The therapeutic goal was surgical resection. Subtotal resection was associated with higher recurrence than total resection, especially when the residual tumor included soft tissue. Conservative management, involving hormone therapy cessation, was reported in 3 cases. Data were limited regarding progesterone receptor status and the use of radiation therapy. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that hormone therapy, particularly long-term exposure to progestins, may contribute to the development and progression of SOMs. Although cessation of hormone therapy can result in partial tumor regression, especially in soft tissue components, surgical resection remains the primary treatment. Hybrid strategies that combine hormone therapy cessation with surgery may be beneficial in selected cases, although prospective data are lacking. Standardized clinical guidelines and further studies are needed to clarify the role of hormone therapy in the management of SOM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.