ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Testing for hereditary cancer genes in men: a missed opportunity for cancer prevention.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Genetic testing for inherited cancer risk syndromes can inform targeted surveillance and intervention, but testing for male patients is inadequately addressed by medical literature and clinical guidelines despite having higher cancer-related mortality and morbidity than women. Here, we evaluate characteristics and hereditary cancer testing practices and outcomes in men compared to women. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed hereditary cancer testing data from a commercial laboratory between 06/2020-08/2023. Outcomes assessed included demographics, personal and family cancer histories, ordering clinic type, gene panel size, test results (pathogenic/likely pathogenic, or negative), and the frequency of clinically actionable variants based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network and other guidelines. Comparisons between men and women were analyzed using odds ratios from Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank test. Results: Of the 224,041 individuals receiving hereditary cancer testing, only 10,936 (5%) were men. Compared to women, men were significantly older at testing (54 Discussion: Men represented a minority in genetic testing for hereditary cancers but had higher test positivity rates. These findings underscore the need for greater integration of routine screening for hereditary cancer risk factors for men in primary care settings to enhance early detection and preventive measures. Addressing testing barriers and promoting awareness among healthcare providers has the potential to improve cancer outcomes for male patients and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.