Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919199›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Nearest neighbour interactions between amino acid residues in short peptides and coil libraries.

Reinhard Schweitzer-Stenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Reinhard Schweitzer-StennerDepartment of Chemistry, Drexel University 3141 Chestnut Street Philadelphia PA 19104 USA rs344@drexel.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5616-0722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDP) or proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDR) perform a plethora of functions mostly in a cellular environment. As unfolded proteins, IDPs can adopt molten globule or coil ensembles of conformations. Regarding the latter, the question arises as to whether they are describable as a self-avoiding random coil. Locally, this requires that amino acid residues sample the entire sterically allowed region of the Ramachandran plot with very similar probabilities and independent of the conformational dynamics of their neighbours. However, various lines of experimental and bioinformatic evidence suggest a more restricted, side chain and nearest neighbor dependent conformational space for individual residues. Over the last 25 years, short peptides and coil libraries were employed to determine conformational propensities of amino acid residues in unfolded states. The question arises as to whether conformational ensembles obtained from these two sources are comparable. In this paper, a variety of metrics were used to compare Ramachandran plots of a limited number of GXYG peptides (X,Y: guest residues) with XY dimers in the coil library of Ting

Identifiers

PMID41919199
PMCPMC13034433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.