ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Benchmarking large language models for medical education: performance on the clinical laboratory technician qualification examination.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown growing applications in medicine, yet their capabilities in the field of clinical laboratory technology remain underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the performance of LLMs in the Chinese Clinical Laboratory Technologist Qualification Examination (CCLTQE) and provide empirical evidence for their application in laboratory medicine. A dataset containing 1,600 single-choice questions is constructed for the CCLTQE exam. The dataset covers four sections: clinical laboratory fundamentals, other medical knowledge related to clinical laboratory technology, clinical laboratory specialized knowledge, and clinical laboratory professional practice competence. We select 12 LLMs for evaluation, including the DeepSeek, GPT, Llama, Qwen, and Gemma series. Results show that Qwen3-235B achieves the highest overall accuracy (89.93%), followed by DeepSeek-R1 (89.75%) and QwQ-32B (89.22%). This study demonstrates that LLMs optimized for Chinese language and domain-specific content demonstrate outstanding performance in CCLTQE, indicating significant potential for AI-assisted education and practice in laboratory medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.