Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919179›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Benchmarking large language models for medical education: performance on the clinical laboratory technician qualification examination.

Yaqing Wang, Yue Jiang, Wen Jin, Weinan Lin, Yijun Xu, Jiangda Wang, Xiuqing Wang, Zhaoxi Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yaqing WangThe Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Yue JiangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Wen JinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Weinan LinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Yijun XuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Jiangda WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Xiuqing WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Zhaoxi FangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown growing applications in medicine, yet their capabilities in the field of clinical laboratory technology remain underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the performance of LLMs in the Chinese Clinical Laboratory Technologist Qualification Examination (CCLTQE) and provide empirical evidence for their application in laboratory medicine. A dataset containing 1,600 single-choice questions is constructed for the CCLTQE exam. The dataset covers four sections: clinical laboratory fundamentals, other medical knowledge related to clinical laboratory technology, clinical laboratory specialized knowledge, and clinical laboratory professional practice competence. We select 12 LLMs for evaluation, including the DeepSeek, GPT, Llama, Qwen, and Gemma series. Results show that Qwen3-235B achieves the highest overall accuracy (89.93%), followed by DeepSeek-R1 (89.75%) and QwQ-32B (89.22%). This study demonstrates that LLMs optimized for Chinese language and domain-specific content demonstrate outstanding performance in CCLTQE, indicating significant potential for AI-assisted education and practice in laboratory medicine.

Indexed as

clinical laboratory technologist qualification examinationdeepseeklaboratory medicinelarge language modelsmodel evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41919179
PMCPMC13034789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.