ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Phase-contingent resilience effects in multilingual medical students: a cross-sectional examination of student demands-resources theory.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Student Demands-Resources (SDR) theory proposes that psychological and environmental resources may become more relevant as situational demands increase. This mechanism remains underexamined in medical students. We assessed whether resilience and language proficiency were associated with academic engagement across training phases in a multilingual medical cohort. Methods: We surveyed 422 medical students at an international medical school (May-September 2024). Hierarchical multiple regression modeled academic engagement (UWES-9S) as a function of psychological resilience (BRS), Arabic language proficiency, clinical training phase, prior residence, and social support (DSSI). The Resilience × Clinical Phase interaction was specified Results: The main-effects model explained 52.8% of variance in engagement ( Conclusion: These hypothesis-generating findings are consistent with phase-contingent resource-engagement associations in SDR theory within medical education. The cross-sectional design and indirect demand proxy do not support causal inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.