ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The role of staging laparoscopy before therapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a real-world, single-center experience.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Staging laparoscopy (SL) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is considered useful in improving the accuracy of staging and resectability. However, currently, there are no standard criteria for selecting patients who may benefit from SL prior to determining the appropriate treatment. In this report, we aimed to determine the role of SL before therapy in patients with PDAC. Methods: This study was a single-center, prospective cohort study comprising patients with PDAC at Iwate Medical University Hospital during the period from November 2021 to June 2025. SL was performed in all patients with PDAC with no radiological distant metastasis before they underwent pancreatic resection or chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, changes of resectability status, complete resection rate and mid-term survival were examined. Results: 102 patients were finally included in the present study. Before SL, according to resectability status, 45 patients (44.1%) were classified as resectable (R), 36 (35.0%) as borderline resectable (BR), and 21 (20.6%) as unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA). SL revealed distant metastasis in 24 (23.5%) patients. The univariate analysis revealed that the factors of CEA positive and CA19-9 ≥ 150, U/mL were associated with a significantly higher risk of occult metastasis. The multivariate analysis revealed that having a CEA positive and CA19-9 ≥ 150, U/mL were the only factors that were independently associated with occult metastasis. For patients with R PDAC before SL, distant metastasis was found after SL in 17.8% of patients. Even in cases where none of the tumor markers were elevated, one case was found to have distant metastasis after SL. There was no morbidity and mortality in this case series. In the intention-to-treat population, the median overall survival (OS) were not reached [95% CI: 22.0 months-not estimable (NE)]. The median DFS was 22.0 months (95% CI: 15.0 months-27.0 months). Of the patients with UR-LA PDAC, despite stage migration, no improvement in OS was observed after SL. Conclusion: SL is safe and effective in determining accurate staging, which may allow for more appropriate treatment. Therefore, SL is actively recommended for patients with R PDAC or BR PDAC who are planning to undergo complete resection shortly to avoid unnecessary surgical exploration, especially those CEA positive or with CA19-9 ≥ 150 U/mL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.