ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Comparison of brain volumes in episodic and chronic migraine using automated whole-brain volumetry.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiplatform Morphometric Profiling of Whole-Brain, Cerebellar Subregional, and Thalamic Nuclei Alterations in Pediatric Migraine Without Aura.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine chronification is associated with increased clinical burden, yet structural neuroimaging findings remain inconsistent. We compared global and regional brain volumes among patients with episodic migraine (EM), chronic migraine (CM), and healthy controls (HC) using an automated whole-brain volumetric approach. This retrospective study included 58 CM patients, 55 EM patients, and 60 age- and sex-matched HC. Diagnoses were established according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3). Structural MRI data acquired on a 1.5-T scanner were processed using the automated volBrain pipeline. Regional brain volumes were compared using one-way ANOVA. To address multiple testing across 220 regions, family-wise error rate (FWER) was controlled with Holm-Bonferroni and false discovery rate (FDR) with Benjamini-Hochberg. Cohen's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.