Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919120›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Constructing and applying a multi-turn psychological support dialogue corpus based on the Helping Skills Chain-of-Thought.

Lanqing Du, Yunong Li, Yujie Long, Shihong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lanqing DuSchool of Computer Science, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies South China Business College, Guangzhou, China.
Yunong LiSchool of Information Science and Technology, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China.
Yujie LongSchool of Computer Science, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies South China Business College, Guangzhou, China.
Shihong ChenSchool of Information Science and Technology, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing prominence of mental health issues, automated psychological support dialogue systems have gradually gained attention. However, existing Chinese corpora mostly remain at the level of single-turn Q&A or lack psychological counseling theoretical grounding, making it difficult to cover the progressive interactions common in psychological counseling. Meanwhile, collecting and releasing large-scale real multi-turn dialogues faces challenges related to privacy protection and high costs. To address this, this paper proposes the Helping Skills Chain-of-Thought (HCoT) method, which integrates Helping Skills Theory with Chain-of-Thought prompting. We utilized GPT-4o to rewrite CD-CN single-turn data into a Chinese multi-turn psychological support corpus, HCoT-Corpus. This corpus contains 22,341 dialogues and 211,473 strategy annotations, achieving a systematic expansion in scale, structural depth, and theoretical grounding. Analysis results indicate that HCoT-Corpus demonstrates high structural coherence and multi-strategy collaborative characteristics under the "Exploration-Comfort-Action" three-stage framework. Experimental evaluations show that, compared to baselines like SMILE, the HCoT method achieves the most balanced performance in emotional resonance, strategy application, and structural integrity. Furthermore, HCoT-Chat, fine-tuned on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, achieved significant advantages in both automatic metrics and cross-model evaluations. This study demonstrates the HCoT method as a promising path for constructing large-scale, theoretically grounded psychological support dialogue datasets.

Indexed as

Chinese corpushelping skills theorylarge language modelsmulti-turn dialoguepsychological support

Identifiers

PMID41919120
PMCPMC13033663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.