Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919100›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

"I am like a camel struggling in the desert": understanding Chinese foreign language teachers' perceived identities through metaphors.

Yiqian Yan, Hua Lu, Shihao Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiqian YanSchool of Foreign Languages, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.
Hua LuSchool of Foreign Studies, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, China.
Shihao GeSchool of Humanities, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With the radical changes taking place in China's foreign language education landscape, Chinese foreign language (CFL) teachers encounter unprecedented challenges in their professional lives. In contrast, little is known about their perceived identities. Using metaphor as a lens, this study investigates how CFL teachers metaphorically represent their identities and what factors contribute to their perceptions. Methods: Data were collected from metaphor elicitation tasks, one-on-one follow-up interviews, and documents. Eighty-two teachers (19 males and 63 females) from four types of universities voluntarily participated in this study. Results: Findings indicate that the elicited 91 metaphors carry positive, negative, neutral and mixed meanings. While teachers offering positive metaphors (about 56%) mainly describe themselves as guides, facilitators, nurturers, leaders, and light emitters, quite a number of teachers produce a wide range of negative metaphors (about 38.5%), which are categorized into hard workers, laborious animals, service providers, petty beings, and inanimate objects. This study identifies teachers' personal philosophy and self-efficacy, institutional demands, socio-cultural environment, students' attitude, disciplinary status, and faculty support as the major contributing factors that affect teachers' identity perceptions. The findings further reveal that CFL teachers' mixed identity perceptions are subject to the interplay of multiple factors. Implications: This study has implications for policymakers and teacher educators in terms of how to improve CFL teachers' identity perceptions amid the shifting and complex higher education landscape.

Indexed as

China contextforeign language teachershigher educationidentity perceptionlanguage teacher identitymetaphor

Identifiers

PMID41919100
PMCPMC13034477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.