Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919093›Full record

ArticleMaterials today (Kidlington, England)2025

Next-generation health monitoring: The role of nanomaterials in 3D-printed wearable devices.

Chuchu Chen, Yonghao Fu, Yun Liu, Prashanta Dutta, Yuehe Lin, Dan Du, Kaiyan Qiu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today (Kidlington, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chuchu ChenSchool of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Yonghao FuSchool of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Yun LiuResearch School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Prashanta DuttaSchool of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Yuehe LinSchool of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Dan DuSchool of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Kaiyan QiuSchool of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH012579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable devices have made transformative advancements driven by the integration of nanomaterials, enhancing their versatility, sensitivity, and overall performance. The emerging 3D printing techniques revolutionize traditional fabrication, enabling the high-efficiency fabrication for sophisticated and miniaturized healthcare monitoring systems. This review summarizes the essential properties of nanomaterials and their roles in 3D printing and examines the pros and cons of various 3D printing methods. Key applications of 3D-printed wearable devices, showcasing the synergistic contributions of nanomaterials, are introduced to provide a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art progress and the promising prospects for next-generation healthcare monitoring.

Indexed as

3D printingHealth monitoringNanomaterialsWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID41919093
PMCPMC13034988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.