ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026
Pathophysiology of Cerebral Microbleeds in Patients with Severe Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Scoping Review.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are increasingly identified in critically ill patients with severe respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This scoping review aims to systematically examine the existing literature to explore the mechanisms contributing to the development of CMBs in ARDS and to summarize current evidence on CMBs associated with severe respiratory failure. We conducted a comprehensive search across two databases, PubMed and CENTRAL, and relevant study registries (PROSPERO and Clinicaltrials.gov), between February 1 and March 3, 2025. Eligible studies included those reporting on the presence of CMBs in adult patients with severe respiratory failure or ARDS, regardless of whether mechanical ventilation (MV) was used. Eighteen observational studies involving critically ill patients with respiratory failure or ARDS were included, with sample sizes ranging from 9 to 214 patients. The proposed pathophysiological mechanisms for the development of CMBs include hypoxaemia and inflammation leading to endothelial injury and blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, cerebral hypoperfusion facilitating interaction between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, microangiopathy with the formation of diffuse microthrombi, and renal failure contributing to uraemia-associated BBB disruption. CMBs were predominantly localized in the corpus callosum and juxtacortical white matter. The majority of patients with CMBs were mechanically ventilated and experienced a prolonged duration of ventilation. Identified risk factors for CMBs development included greater disease severity, coagulation abnormalities, and renal dysfunction. In conclusion, CMBs are increasingly recognized in critically ill patients with ARDS, particularly in the corpus callosum and juxtacortical white matter, but current evidence is associative rather than causal. Their pathophysiology likely involves compromised small vessel integrity due to hypoxia-induced endothelial injury, inflammation, and possible direct viral effects on cerebral microvasculature. These mechanisms are further exacerbated by coagulation abnormalities and disruption of the BBB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.