ReviewArtificial photosynthesis (Washington, D.C.)2026
A Multifaceted Vision of Challenges and Opportunities in Practical Artificial Photosynthesis Devices.
Review in Artificial photosynthesis (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Activating Ionic Carbon Nitrides via Epitaxial Dyadic Coupling for Efficient Solar-Driven HAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The landscape and status of artificial photosynthesis devices for solar fuels are analyzed by critically combining indications from roadmaps and status reports, patent and literature trends, a market perspective analysis, and an examination of selected ongoing projects in the field. This multifaceted approach aims to provide an innovative vision of opportunities and accelerate their implementation. It integrates insights from multiple perspectives to overcome the partial view of priorities and key elements needed to foster development in the area. Additionally, they include strategies to accelerate implementation from individual analyses. This is recognized as a crucial current gap. Recommendations are provided for aspects that should be introduced to accelerate progress toward significant implementation before 2050, based on this analysis and methodological approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.