ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Exploring the molecular landscape of environmental responses in the Antarctic plant
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The harsh environmental conditions of Antarctica significantly influence plant responses, impacting both defence mechanisms and developmental processes. Moreover, plant-associated microbial communities further modulate physiological functions, creating a complex network of interactions. This study aimed to investigate how local environmental conditions and plant-associated microbiota shape the transcriptomic landscape of the Antarctic plant Materials and methods: A comparative metatranscriptomic analysis was conducted on plants collected from three sites spanning a coastal-to-inland gradient of increasing climatic severity to investigate both the functional roles of differentially expressed plant genes and taxonomic profiling of the associated microbial community. In addition, the content of photosynthetic and protective pigments was quantified biochemically to assess whether environmental conditions influence the photosynthetic pathway. Results and discussion: The results suggested that Site 2 (Puchalski Station) represents a particularly favourable microenvironment that optimises the physiological performance of Conclusions: These findings highlight the sensitivity of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.