Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919021›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026

Sex-Specific Coronary Artery Calcium Score Threshold Predictive of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Denizhan Ozdemir, Devarshi Vasa, Serdar Farhan, Manish Vinayak, James Johnson, Vishal Dhulipala, Amir Hamdan, Gina LaRocca, Annapoorna S Kini, Deepak L Bhatt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding Sex-Specific Coronary Artery Calcium Score.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  2. Lessons From the Past.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Denizhan OzdemirThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Devarshi VasaThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Serdar FarhanThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Manish VinayakThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
James JohnsonThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Vishal DhulipalaThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Amir HamdanThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Gina LaRoccaThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Annapoorna S KiniThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Deepak L BhattThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Samin K SharmaThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) are rapidly being adopted for the noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). One of the primary limitations of calcium imaging is the inability to assess obstructive lesions in the presence of a high calcium burden. Currently, there is no guidance on what level of coronary artery calcium indicates a high risk of obstructive CAD. We aimed to determine sex-specific CACS thresholds suggestive of obstructive CAD by comparing coronary angiography with adjunctive tools to available CACS information. Methods: From August 2018 to August 2023, we retrospectively analyzed 1799 consecutive patients' clinical characteristics, angiographic information, and available intracoronary physiological/anatomical testing at a single institution. We evaluated the sex-specific distribution of CACS and its specificity for identifying obstructive CAD at a threshold of 90%. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the obstructive (n = 1223) and nonobstructive (n = 576) CAD groups. A CACS of ≥1000 in women (HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.77-4.47; Conclusions: A CACS of ≥1000 in women and ≥1400 in men identifies obstructive CAD at 90% specificity. These thresholds should be prospectively validated and may potentially be used to guide the selection of patients who would benefit from intensification of medical therapy or invasive evaluation in the appropriate clinical context.

Indexed as

coronary artery calcium scoreobstructive coronary artery diseasesex-specific coronary artery calcium score threshold

Identifiers

PMID41919021
PMCPMC13033808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.