Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919013›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026

Sex-Based Differences in Long-Term Outcomes Following Intravascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis.

Mangesh Kritya, Chloe Kharsa, Gal Sella, Devin Olek, Bin S Teh, Muhammad Faraz Anwaar, Joseph Elias, Elia El Hajj, Albert E Raizner, Andrew Farach and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mangesh KrityaDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Chloe KharsaDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Gal SellaDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Devin OlekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Bin S TehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Muhammad Faraz AnwaarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Joseph EliasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Elia El HajjDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Albert E RaiznerDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Andrew FarachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Neal S KleimanDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Alpesh R ShahDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenging complication following percutaneous coronary intervention, and intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) has proved to be an important treatment strategy. However, limited data exist on sex-specific outcomes following IVBT. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 223 patients (61 women, 162 men) treated with IVBT for ISR between 2014 and 2023. The primary end points were all-cause mortality, target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes included technical success, myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and heart failure hospitalization. Multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for clinical and procedural covariates. Results: Baseline characteristics were largely similar between sexes, except for higher body surface area and diabetes prevalence in men. Procedural success rates did not differ between groups. However, female sex was independently associated with a higher risk of target lesion revascularization (adjusted HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.07-3.01; Conclusions: Despite comparable procedural outcomes, women undergoing IVBT for ISR experienced higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events. These findings underscore the need for sex-stratified risk assessment and further prospective research to understand and address sex-based differences in outcomes after IVBT.

Indexed as

in-stent restenosisintravascular brachytherapypercutaneous coronary interventionsex-based differences

Identifiers

PMID41919013
PMCPMC13033771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.