ArticleJournal of aerosol science2026
Exploratory application of DMD for particle deposition and fluid field in the respiratory tract.
Article in Journal of aerosol science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geometry-conditioned diffusion generation of Lagrangian particle trajectories in human airways.Research square · 2026Article
- Unveiling Particulate Matter-Lung Interactions from Static Models to Dynamic Lung-on-Chips.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simulating particle deposition in the respiratory tract requires high computational effort due to the intricate airway geometry and complex airflow-particle interactions. To address this challenge, this study introduces the first demonstration of Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) as a reduced-order model to infer the trajectories of inhaled particles during a breathing cycle and to evaluate the applicability of DMD as a fluid field interpolator. The periodic nature of respiration and the predominance of sinusoidal boundary conditions make it well-suited for DMD analysis. Three high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed under three different inlet volume airflow conditions for the same realistic adult male anthropomorphic phantom respiratory tract model. Reduced-rank DMD reconstructions were compared to the CFD ground truth, yielding a Mean Relative Error (MRE) of 12% in the velocity field. Additionally, a fourth simulation was conducted at an intermediate point to evaluate the interpolation capability of the parametric DMD framework in complex systems. This interpolation resulted in an MRE of 20%, with the reconstructed flow field capturing dominant fluid modes and overall dynamics, though localized discrepancies reached relative errors up to 70%. While DMD effectively reconstructed fluid fields, preserving mean flow regimes, some deviations were observed in Lagrangian particle tracking, specifically in spatial deposition resolution. However, the method approximated overall particle distribution with an 85% correlation to ground truth and was effective in representing regional deposition patterns across the tracheobronchial tree. These findings support the utility of DMD a computationally efficient approach for fluid field reconstruction and particle transport analysis in respiratory flow simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.