Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919001›Full record

ArticleJournal of aerosol science2026

Exploratory application of DMD for particle deposition and fluid field in the respiratory tract.

Martin S Graffigna, Ignacio R Bartol, Mauricio E Tano, Shaheen Azim Dewji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aerosol science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin S GraffignaNuclear and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics Program, George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 770 State St NW, Atlanta, 30332-0405, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-0795
Ignacio R BartolNuclear and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics Program, George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 770 State St NW, Atlanta, 30332-0405, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6685-0134
Mauricio E TanoCollaborative Computing Center (C3), Idaho National Laboratory, 955 MK Simpson Boulevard, Idaho Falls, 83415, ID, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3417-3869
Shaheen Azim DewjiNuclear and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics Program, George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 770 State St NW, Atlanta, 30332-0405, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3699-5877

Funding

Project 4: Post-Exposure Biomarkers and Remediation of Radionuclide ContaminantsP01AI165380 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WESLEY E BOLCH · 2022 to 2026
$12.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI165380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulating particle deposition in the respiratory tract requires high computational effort due to the intricate airway geometry and complex airflow-particle interactions. To address this challenge, this study introduces the first demonstration of Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) as a reduced-order model to infer the trajectories of inhaled particles during a breathing cycle and to evaluate the applicability of DMD as a fluid field interpolator. The periodic nature of respiration and the predominance of sinusoidal boundary conditions make it well-suited for DMD analysis. Three high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed under three different inlet volume airflow conditions for the same realistic adult male anthropomorphic phantom respiratory tract model. Reduced-rank DMD reconstructions were compared to the CFD ground truth, yielding a Mean Relative Error (MRE) of 12% in the velocity field. Additionally, a fourth simulation was conducted at an intermediate point to evaluate the interpolation capability of the parametric DMD framework in complex systems. This interpolation resulted in an MRE of 20%, with the reconstructed flow field capturing dominant fluid modes and overall dynamics, though localized discrepancies reached relative errors up to 70%. While DMD effectively reconstructed fluid fields, preserving mean flow regimes, some deviations were observed in Lagrangian particle tracking, specifically in spatial deposition resolution. However, the method approximated overall particle distribution with an 85% correlation to ground truth and was effective in representing regional deposition patterns across the tracheobronchial tree. These findings support the utility of DMD a computationally efficient approach for fluid field reconstruction and particle transport analysis in respiratory flow simulations.

Indexed as

CFDDepositionDMDDynamic Mode DecompositionFluid dynamicsReduced order modelRespiratory tract

Identifiers

PMID41919001
PMCPMC13035352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.