ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2026
Investigation of the Effects of Tooth-Borne, Tooth-Bone-Borne and Bone-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on the Nasomaxillary Complex Using CBCT.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of tooth-borne, tooth-bone-borne, and bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on the nasomaxillary complex in individuals with maxillary transverse constriction using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to compare the outcomes of these expansion modalities. Methods: CBCT images from 45 patients (aged 10-17 years) with maxillary transverse constriction who were treated with RME were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups according to the appliance used: tooth-borne (Hyrax), tooth-bone-borne (hybrid), and bone-borne. CBCT records were obtained at three time points: before treatment, after active expansion, and after a 3-month retention period. Dentoalveolar and skeletal measurements were performed on the CBCT images. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests, while intragroup comparisons were performed using repeated-measures ANOVA and Friedman tests. Results: CBCT evaluation revealed no statistically significant intergroup differences in dental and skeletal measurements. However, all RME groups showed significant increases between time points, most of which were maintained after the retention period. In the mandible, increases in intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths, observed during the active expansion phase, partially relapsed or lost their statistical significance following retention. Conclusion: All RME modalities produced significant skeletal and dental expansion in the maxilla, with the bone-borne appliance showing greater skeletal effects than the hybrid and tooth-borne appliances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.