Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41918932›Full record

ArticleBMJ oncology2026

BASECAMP-1 screening study: a model for efficient enrolment in precision oncology clinical trials.

J Randolph Hecht, Julian R Molina, Kirstin Liechty, Theodore H Welling, Patrick M Grierson, Sandip P Patel, Kedar Kirtane, M Pia Morelli, Frederick L Locke, David G Maloney and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04981119 (An Observational Study Obtaining Solid Tumor Tissue From Participants and Apheresis for CAR T-Cell Therapy Manufacturing), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04981119 recruitingnot on this map

An Observational Study Obtaining Solid Tumor Tissue From Participants and Apheresis for CAR T-Cell Therapy Manufacturing

TypeobservationalSponsorA2 Biotherapeutics Inc.Ran2021 to 2029Enrolled200ConditionsSolid Tumor, Adult, Colorectal Cancer, Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Pancreatic CancerArmsApheresis, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), Long Range NGS HLA typing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

J Randolph Hecht *UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Santa Monica, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2277-4157
Julian R Molina *Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9962-4635
Kirstin LiechtyA2 Biotherapeutics Inc, Agoura Hills, California, USA.
Theodore H WellingUCSD Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA.
Patrick M GriersonWashington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sandip P PatelUCSD Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA.
Kedar KirtaneMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-9577
M Pia MorelliUT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Frederick L LockeMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
David G MaloneyFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Salman R PunekarNYU Langone Health Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Sarah NikiforowDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yi LinMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Matthew UlricksonBanner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona, USA.
Jennifer M SpechtFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ariane Lozac'hmeurTempus AI Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Chelsea K OstermanTempus AI Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ryan J GardeTempus AI Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Gena A RangelTempus AI Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Eric W NgA2 Biotherapeutics Inc, Agoura Hills, California, USA.
John S WelchA2 Biotherapeutics Inc, Agoura Hills, California, USA.
Jessica C TebbetsA2 Biotherapeutics Inc, Agoura Hills, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2860-2006
William Y GoA2 Biotherapeutics Inc, Agoura Hills, California, USA.
Diane M SimeoneUCSD Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Identifying eligible patients for precision oncology clinical trials is challenging, particularly for rare molecular subpopulations. To address this challenge, A2 Biotherapeutics developed BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), a non-interventional master screening study to identify patients eligible for interventional studies of logic-gated Tmod chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Eligible patients for these interventional trials have an advanced solid malignancy and are germline human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02 heterozygous, with tumour-associated HLA-A loss of heterozygosity (LOH). HLA-A LOH occurs in ~16% of advanced solid malignancies; therefore, an efficient screening strategy is required. This report describes BASECAMP-1; compares the efficiency of two screening methods; and discusses the broader advantages of BASECAMP-1 beyond efficient enrolment. Methods and analysis: Patients are identified for BASECAMP-1 using two approaches. In the traditional approach, common for clinical trials, investigators consent and screen all patients who might be good candidates for cell therapy trials, with no prior knowledge of patient HLA-A type or LOH status. To further optimise our approach, we co-developed with Tempus AI (Tempus) the bioinformatic programme Aware, which identifies potentially eligible patients with tumour-associated HLA-A*02 LOH within a clinico-genomic database that includes linked genomic and transcriptomic sequencing and clinical data collected during routine care. Results: Over 42 months of using a traditional approach to identify eligible patients, 1918 patients at 13 study sites were consented and screened for BASECAMP-1; of these, 30 patients with tumour-associated HLA-A*02 LOH were enrolled (~0.7 participants per month). Over the last 30 months of that same period, Tempus Aware screening was implemented and 55 patients with tumour-associated HLA-A*02 LOH were enrolled (~1.8 participants per month). The bioinformatic approach identified more patients than the traditional approach and used sequencing results produced as part of the standard clinical tumour sequencing workflow, reducing resource use and study staff burden. Additional advantages of using a screening study, such as BASECAMP-1, include manufacturing efficiencies and collection of a large dataset of molecular and clinical parameters that can be used to supplement trial analyses. Conclusions: The BASECAMP-1 study demonstrates a clinico-genomic screening approach can more efficiently identify patients for precision oncology trials. Furthermore, precision oncology can be enhanced through collaborative data-sharing. Trial registration number: NCT04981119.

Indexed as

Cell therapyClinical TrialMetastatic cancerSolid tumour

Identifiers

PMID41918932
PMCPMC13034198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.