ArticleForest policy and economics2025
Qualitative perspectives on safety, health, and productivity from Northeast United States loggers: Implications for industry sustainability.
Article in Forest policy and economics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The logging industry in the United States has experienced a shift from conventional to mechanized operations. While logging remains the most fatal industry in the US, the protection of the operator inside an equipment cab has had positive impacts on safety. However, mechanization has introduced new health and safety risks for loggers. In this study, we sought to expand our knowledge of health and safety concerns by conducting semi-structured interviews with loggers in the northeastern US, specifically New York, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Using a 17-question interview guide, 29 interviews were conducted and recorded. Interviews were transcribed and coded using a qualitative thematic analysis approach in NVivo 12. Discovered themes included: health risks associated with mechanization and mental stress related to financial burdens, difficulty accessing health insurance, and the public's view of the industry. Participants expressed their concerns over health risks associated with prolonged machinery usage, especially weight gain. Loggers shared that financial stress was often a result of debt accrual from equipment purchases and unstable timber markets. Few of the loggers interviewed had health insurance and cited that because of the expense and perceived benefits, it was not a priority. Lastly, loggers shared their concerns over the prevalence of untrained logging operations negatively impacting the industry and how it affects their businesses. With these data, we can better identify strategies that would effectively reach and assist loggers to improve their health and safety conditions at work, allowing companies to reduce the economic impacts associated with illness and injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.