ArticlePeerJ2026
Application of adaptive deep learning-based automatic segmentation in radiomics model for preoperative WHO/ISUP grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study with manual segmentation.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- CT-Based Radiomics in the Characterization of Solid Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of different methods for segmenting tumor regions of interest in building prediction models for the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center study analyzed computed tomography (CT) images of 405 patients (training/test cohort, 324/81) with pathologically confirmed ccRCC. Two methods were used for tumor segmentation: (1) automatic segmentation: the nnU-Net model, trained on the public KiTS19 dataset, and (2) manual segmentation. Radiomics features were extracted and selected from both automatically and manually segmented images. Support vector machine (SVM) and K-nearest neighbors were used to construct pathological grade prediction models. The segmentation accuracies of nnU-Net and manual annotation were compared. The receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate diagnostic performance. The DeLong test was used to assess the differences between the models. Results: The average Dice similarity coefficient was 0.842 ± 0.149. Automatic segmentation was time-efficient. A total of 1,834 features were extracted from each tumor. The AutoSeg-SVM model with nine features achieved the highest diagnostic performance, with an AUC value of 0.865 (0.726-1.000), an accuracy of 79.0%, sensitivity of 85.7%, and specificity of 77.6%. Both models in the automatic segmentation group showed comparable or slightly better performance than those in the manual segmentation group, although the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The nnU-Net automatic segmentation provided diagnostic efficacy comparable to manual segmentation in preoperative WHO/ISUP grade prediction for ccRCC. It significantly reduced the time required for lesion segmentation and improved workflow efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.