ArticlePeerJ2026
MetaPepticon: automated prediction of anticancer peptides from microbial genomes and metagenomes.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual Activity Microbial Peptides Catalog.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anticancer peptides (ACPs) are increasingly recognized as promising therapeutic candidates due to their ability to selectively target cancer cells. However, the systematic discovery of novel ACPs, particularly from high-throughput sequencing datasets, remains hindered by technical and methodological limitations. Current prediction frameworks require pre-extracted peptide sequences, involve manual preprocessing, and yield variable results, which restricts their applicability for large-scale, data-driven discovery. Methods: To address these limitations, we developed MetaPepticon, a modular, end-to-end pipeline for the discovery of ACP candidates from diverse sequencing inputs, including raw genomic, metagenomic, transcriptomic, and metatranscriptomic reads, as well as assembled contigs and peptide sequences. MetaPepticon automates quality control, filtering, assembly, small open reading frame prediction, ACP classification using multiple predictive algorithms, and Results: MetaPepticon enables scalable and reproducible ACP prediction from raw sequences through integration of multiple predictors within a configurable agreement framework. Applied to 41,171 microbial genomes and 4,072,884 peptides, MetaPepticon identified 10,725 moderate-agreement ACP candidates, including 4,590 novel, non-toxic peptides. MetaPepticon expands the practical applicability of existing ACP prediction methods to high-throughput sequencing data and is freely available at: https://github.com/arikanlab/MetaPepticon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.