ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2026
The Code of Practice 2025 and the medicolegal definition of death.
Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In January 2025 the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges published an updated Code of Practice for the Diagnosis and Confirmation of Death, the first major update for 17 years. It represents the authoritative medical consensus on the diagnosis and confirmation of death in all contexts (and in all age groups) in the UK. This paper reviews the new Code, highlighting the major updates from the 2008 guidance and their relevance for intensive care clinicians. It goes on to explore the wider legal history and context, in particular the role that previous versions of the Academy's guidelines have played during the emergence of a common law definition of death. It examines the important legal cases in which the Code of Practice was endorsed and ultimately adopted by the courts as the definitive medical and legal definition of death in the UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.