ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2026
Exploring the impact of occupational therapy provision in the intensive care unit: A UK single-centre service evaluation.
Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Acute-Phase Occupational Therapy and Quality of Life at Hospital Discharge and 90 Days After Discharge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational Therapy (OT) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) supports recovery in physical, cognitive, emotional domains, and activities of daily living (ADL), yet. Provision across the UK remains inconsistent, with variable staffing and role integration and no data illustrating the potential impact from such roles. Method: A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken in a UK NHS adult ICU to examine the association of increased OT staffing with changes in rehabilitation activity and functional status. Patients with ICU stays over 7 days were included in line with NICE CG83 high rehabilitation risk criteria. Three 1-month timepoints were compared. Data included delivery of OT interventions, functional outcomes (Modified Barthel Index), and discharge destination. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included. Increased OT staffing was associated with a greater proportion of patients receiving OT assessments, upper limb rehabilitation, personal activities of daily living retraining, cognitive screening, delirium management, and therapy handover. Modified Barthel index scores at hospital discharge increased across timepoints 1, 2 and 3 (55, 71.5 and 82, respectively ( Discussion: Increased OT staffing was associated with greater delivery of rehabilitation interventions and potential improvements in functional outcomes. However, differences in patient clinical complexity across timepoints may also have influenced these results. Further evaluation is required to establish causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.