Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41918792›Full record

ReviewFood technology and biotechnology

Modern Food Systems Challenged by Food Safety Culture.

Mojca Jevšnik Podlesnik, Peter Raspor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food technology and biotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mojca Jevšnik PodlesnikDepartment of Sanitary Engineering Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6166-0983
Peter RasporEmeritus Professor of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-3157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of regulatory development, standardized food safety management systems, and technological advances, foodborne outbreaks, recalls, and food fraud continue to pose significant public health and societal challenges. These persistent failures increasingly reveal systemic vulnerabilities that deficiencies in legislation or formal control mechanisms alone cannot explain. Instead, they highlight the critical role of human behaviour, organizational culture, and socio-technical interactions within modern, complex agrifood networks. Food safety culture has therefore emerged as a key determinant of food safety performance, linking regulatory frameworks with everyday practices in food establishments. While HACCP-based systems clearly define procedures and responsibilities, their effectiveness is limited when behavioural consistency, leadership commitment, communication, and resource availability are weak. Research consistently shows that even well-designed systems are insufficiently monitored when organizational alignment and behavioural adherence are lacking, allowing deviations from safe practices to persist. Contemporary approaches move beyond compliance-driven models towards cultural transformation, emphasizing leadership engagement, effective risk communication, learning-oriented environments, and evidence-based behavioural interventions. Increasingly, digital tools and real-time monitoring systems support this transition by strengthening feedback, transparency, and adaptive risk management across food systems. Strengthening food safety culture therefore requires coordinated, multi-level action that integrates governance, technology and human-oriented approaches. Such transformation is essential not only for improving food safety outcomes but also for protecting public health, maintaining consumer trust and enhancing the long-term resilience and sustainability of modern food systems.

Indexed as

food safetyfood safety culturefood systemsgood practiceshuman behaviourhuman factor

Identifiers

PMID41918792
PMCPMC13034769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.